U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Judicial Perceptions of Child Witness Competence

NCJ Number
162888
Journal
Law and Human Behavior Volume: 20 Issue: 3 Dated: (June 1996) Pages: 313-334
Author(s)
J Cashmore; K Bussey
Date Published
1996
Length
22 pages
Annotation
Fifty magistrates and judges in New South Wales, Australia, were asked by means of interview or questionnaire about their beliefs, concerns, and practices related to child witnesses.
Abstract
Concern about the difficulties faced by child witnesses in the legal system has led to two major areas of reform: the relaxation of competence and corroboration requirements and the introduction of special procedures and physical facilities to reduce the emotional pressures of testifying. Although the implementation of these measures depends largely on judicial discretion, little is known about judicial perceptions of child witnesses and about judicial acceptance of these measures. This study found considerable variance in judges' views about the competence of child witnesses and the need for special protective measures in court for these witnesses. There was, however, more consensus about those aspects of children's ability to testify that give rise to judicial concerns about their competence. Children's honesty was not at issue; they were generally regarded as being at least as honest as adults, if not more so. They were, however, perceived as highly suggestible and susceptible to the influence of others and prone to fantasy. These findings are consistent with the findings of other studies, and they provide a basis for judicial education in relation to child witnesses. 1 table and 51 references