NCJ Number
138729
Date Published
1992
Length
14 pages
Annotation
In describing and anlyzing the juvenile diversion process and diversion programs, this chapter examines what diversion is and why it is practiced, the history of diversion, the various types of diversion programs, how well diversion works, and the critical research and practice issues.
Abstract
Although there is little agreement on a specific definition of diversion, the concept generally involves a decision to turn youth away from the official system and handle them through alternative procedures and programs. The expectation is that diverted youth are more likely to be rehabilitated than similar youth processed in a traditional manner. Juvenile diversion became popular in the 1960's, fueled by rapidly increasing juvenile arrests and the growing belief that the juvenile court was failing to rehabilitate youth. Only in the late 1970's was diversion scrutinized by researchers. Diversion's ability to reduce recidivism has received mixed reviews by researchers. Research has established, however, that most diversion programs are capable of widening the "net" of the justice system, as they extend instead of reduce the proportion of youth subject to some form of governmental control or supervision. Given the expense of formal processing and traditional juvenile corrections, diversion programs are likely to continue in popularity. What is needed are more sound criteria for determining which youth should be diverted so net-widening is prevented. Also, greater attention should be paid to the due-process rights of juveniles accused of delinquent acts as they are being considered for diversion. Additionally, juvenile justice officials should improve their ability to match diverted youth to appropriate interventions and services. This implies that communities should develop a broad array of services for youth. Also, much greater care should be given to the avoidance of stigmatization for diverted youth. Research suggestions are offered. 24 references