U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

The longitudinal relationship between social support and victimization among latino teens

NCJ Number
308073
Journal
Journal of Adolescence Volume: 95 Issue: 8 Dated: 2023 Pages: 1603-1616
Author(s)
Chiara Sabina; Iris Cardenas; Desi Vásquez; Susana Mariscal; Carlos A. Cuevas
Date Published
2023
Length
14 pages
Annotation

Using stress prevention and support deterioration models, this study examines the relationship between social support and victimization of Latino youth over time.

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between social support and victimization of Latino youth over time, utilizing the stress prevention and support deterioration models. The authors did not find support for the stress prevention model but did find support for the support deterioration model. Teens who were victimized tended to have lower levels of subsequent social support, highlighting the need to equip peers, family, and significant others to adequately respond to victimization disclosures. To address the research questions the authors utilized data from Waves 1 and 2 (n = 574) of the Dating Violence among Latino Adolescents (DAVILA) study, a national bilingual phone survey of self-identified Latino youth and their caregiver. Cross-lagged panel modeling was used to assess the fit of the two theoretical models to observed patterns of covariance among the victimization and social support variables specified. Results show that victimization at Wave 1 was positively and strongly related to victimization at Wave 2 and social support at Wave 1 was positively and moderately associated with social support at Wave 2. As hypothesized, higher levels of victimization at Wave 1 were significantly related to decreases in social support at Wave 2 (β = −.15). Wave 1 social support was not significantly related to victimization at Wave 2. (Published Abstract Provided)