NCJ Number
239727
Journal
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology Volume: 56 Issue: 3 Dated: May 2012 Pages: 465-482
Date Published
May 2012
Length
18 pages
Annotation
In this article, the dominant cognitive-behavioral interpretation of cognitive distortions is contrasted with two alternative interpretations.
Abstract
Most structured sex-offender programs are based on a cognitive-behavioral model of behavior change. Within this overarching theoretical paradigm, extensive use of cognitive distortions is seen as a central core symptom among sex offenders. However, the literature on cognitive distortions lacks a clear and consistent definition of the term. It is unclear whether cognitive distortions are consciously employed excuses or unconscious processes serving to protect the offender from feelings of guilt or shame. In this article, the dominant cognitive-behavioral interpretation of cognitive distortions is contrasted with two alternative interpretations. One is based on an attributional perspective and the notion of attributional biases. The other explanation is based on a narrative approach focusing on the action elements of cognitive distortions, that is, as something people do rather than something they have. Clinical implications of these alternative conceptualizations are discussed and illustrated throughout by a case example. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage Journals.