To March or Not to March: Is That the Question? (From Juvenile and Adult Boot Camps, P 151-168, 1996 -- See NCJ-165590)

• NCJ Number: 165599
• Author(s): C L Clark; R Moscicki; J Perry
• Date Published: 1996
• Length: 18 pages
• Sale Source: American Correctional Association
• Publication Type: Program/Project Evaluation
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America
• Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.

Annotation

Boot camps are surrounded by controversy, primarily because of their military focus, but the real issue is whether boot camps produce results.

Abstract

If boot camps are harsh, it may be because correctional policy responds to what society appears to want. The public does not always distinguish between violent and nonviolent criminals and generally equates prison with murderers, rapists, and child molesters. Punishment does not necessarily reduce violence, however, and the demand for discipline and adherence to the military model is seen by critics as rigid and dehumanizing. Boot camps should be designed so that program content serves program goals. Learning experiences should be provided to interrupt a pattern of repeated negative behavior. The military model may be beneficial in that it teaches people to listen and pay attention. Some boot camps deviate somewhat from the military model and emphasize substance abuse treatment, academics, and life skills. A balance between discipline and treatment and aftercare are important in boot camp programs. 30 references