U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Maternal Versus Adolescent Reports of Self-Control: Implications for Testing the General Theory of Crime

NCJ Number
242658
Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 41 Issue: 1 Dated: January/February 2013 Pages: 24-32
Author(s)
Ryan C. Meldrum; Jacob T.N. Young; Callie Harbin Burt; Alex R. Piquero
Date Published
February 2013
Length
9 pages
Annotation
Using data drawn from a sample of U.S. families across 10 cities, this study used structural equation models to examine whether identical indicators of maternal and adolescent reports of self-control are differentially related to delinquency and parental socialization.
Abstract
There were two key findings. First, the strength of the relationship between self-control and delinquency was substantively weaker when maternal reports of self-control were used in lieu of adolescent reports of self-control. Second, a comprehensive measure of parental socialization - capturing dimensions of monitoring, hostility, and warmth - is strongly related to adolescent reported self-control, but only weakly related to maternal reported self-control. The findings thus indicate that conclusions about the strength of the link between self-control, delinquency, and parenting depend on the source of the measure of self-control. The findings indicate that maternal and adolescent reports of self-control cannot be used interchangeably in testing Gottfredson and Hirschi's self-control construct in their general theory of crime. Future research that examines self-control theory should pay greater attention to the source of the measure of self-control and the implications of using different sources of self-control in interpreting findings of theoretical significance. Existing tests of self-control theory that use different information to measure self-control diverge in their findings. 5 tables, 8 notes, and 49 references