U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Mental Retardation and Delinquency (From Mainstreaming Retardation Delinquency, P 19-34, 1991, Richard S Greene, ed. -- See NCJ-136722)

NCJ Number
136724
Author(s)
M E Wallace; S B Billick
Date Published
1991
Length
16 pages
Annotation
This paper explores attempts that have been made to deal with the mentally retarded and the behavioral problems they present. The juvenile justice system and mentally retarded juvenile offenders are described.
Abstract
Mentally retarded children and adolescents are at greater risk for behavioral disturbances than their peers. The mentally retarded population, however, is very heterogeneous with multiple factors contributing to the presence or absence of behavioral problems. Many studies have been conducted that espouse various theories of mental retardation and behavioral disturbance. On a more general level, society as a whole is responsible for dealing fairly and effectively with juveniles, juvenile offenders, and mentally retarded juvenile offenders. To this end, the founding premise of the juvenile justice system is that juveniles are incompetent to commit crimes with the same intent as adults because of immaturity in psychological development. As the juvenile justice system has evolved and is still evolving, concern over balancing the duty and right of the State to care for those who cannot care for themselves with the rights of those individuals against loss of liberty due to arbitrary and possibly harsh decisions by persons in authority has been prominent. Mentally retarded juvenile offenders are likely to differ in social profile from nonmentally retarded offenders. The mentally retarded juvenile is likely to be older, to have attended special education, to be nonwhite, to have attended less school, and to have less incidence of drug abuse problems. If mentally retarded offenders are to be justly served in the courts, a method must be available to examine the person and determine his or her realm of culpability and developmental competence. The psychiatric evaluation and disposition of mentally retarded offenders are discussed. 25 references