NCJ Number
107408
Journal
Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal Volume: 12 Issue: 2 Dated: (1987) Pages: 407-432
Date Published
1987
Length
26 pages
Annotation
Despite the availability of relatively low-cost technology, few Michigan courts use microcomputers at all, and those using them tend to do so in very standard and noncreative ways.
Abstract
Moreover, some circuits appear to be unaware of the benefits of computers. Study data came from a mail survey of the 55 Michigan circuit courts. Thirty-eight responded, including both urban and rural courts, courts from all parts of the State, and courts with differing criminal caseloads. Only seven courts use microcomputers. Inadequate budgets sometimes prevent the introduction of microcomputer into courts. However, courts often fail to see how microcomputers could help. The use of computers in the Detroit Recorder's Court to help implement the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines is an example of the creative application of technology. The State's courts could promote microcomputer use by creating an office of software development with the court system. A central State office must also consider the desirability of standardized hardware. Clear documentation and training seminars are probably also needed to encourage microcomputer use in Michigan courts. Footnotes, tables, and sample reports related to sentencing and sentencing guidelines.