NCJ Number
29178
Date Published
1975
Length
12 pages
Annotation
THIS ARTICLE EXPLORES THE DEFINITION OF WHAT IS MEANT BY THE 'IN-PRESENCE' REQUIREMENT OF AN OFFICER IN RELATION TO THE COMMISSION OF A MISDEMEANOR, AND THE MISDEMEANANT'S SUBSEQUENT ARREST.
Abstract
HISTORICALLY THE LAW HAS ONLY PERMITTED AN OFFICER TO MAKE ARRESTS WITHOUT A WARRANT FOR MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES WHEN THE OFFENSE OCCURRED IN HIS PRESENCE, BASICALLY BECAUSE THE OFFENSE WAS OF A MINOR NATURE AND THERE WAS NO URGENT NEED TO TAKE THE SUSPECT IMMEDIATELY INTO CUSTODY. A FEDERAL COURT HAS RULED THAT 'IN-PRESENCE' MEANS THAT ALL THE BODY'S SENSES, RATHER THAN SIGHT ALONE, CAN SATISFY THE 'IN-PRESENCE' REQUIREMENT. BUT 'IN-PRESENCE' REQUIREMENTS ARE GIVING WAY IN SOME JURISDICTIONS, PARTICULARLY WHERE THE MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE IS OF A SERIOUS NATURE AND WHERE THERE EXISTED THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE SUSPECT FLEEING. THE AUTHOR URGES REVISION OF TRADITIONAL DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR LIMITATIONS. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT)