U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Municipal Liability for Police Misconduct: Must Victims Now Prove Intent?

NCJ Number
112827
Journal
Yale Law Journal Volume: 97 Issue: 3 Dated: (February 1988) Pages: 448-465
Author(s)
R Friedman
Date Published
1988
Length
18 pages
Annotation
In Monell v. Department of Social Services, the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door to institutional litigation under section 1983, it held that a municipal Government could be subject to liability whenever an official policy or custom caused a constitutional tort.
Abstract
Three major police misconduct cases have offered a conception of the policy or custom test that would limit municipal liability for omission to only the most flagrant misconduct. These opinions suggest that only intentional omissions or direct authorization should subject a municipality to suit under Monell. It is argued that this judicial trend toward requiring proof of municipal intent or affirmative authorization in section 1983 cases must be rejected. By demanding intent, the courts restrict a cause of action that undermines both the viability of Monell and the legislative purpose of the civil rights statute. An intent requirement would preclude recovery for most victims of police brutality who allege municipal liability for their injuries, thus reducing deterrence of misconduct and incentives for institutional improvement. Rather than requiring affirmative authorization or intent, the courts should employ a standard of reasonable foreseeability of harm in addressing municipal responsibility. If a municipal policy of neglect allows a citizen to be abused by police, the victim then can seek the relief that section 1983 was enacted to provide. 84 references.