NCJ Number
188793
Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 29 Issue: 3 Dated: May/June 2001 Pages: 233-240
Editor(s)
Kent B. Joscelyn
Date Published
May 2001
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This study explored how common curfew ordinances in America are and described their implementation and perceived effects.
Abstract
The use of curfews as a means of controlling youth movement during peak crime periods is a contended issue among academic, police, and civil liberty communities. Advocates believe that these measures are effective and appropriate methods for communities to control delinquent behavior. Opponents claim that curfews have only interim, short-term effects on delinquent behavior and violate the civil rights of youth. Little is known about the extent and application of curfew ordinances in American communities. This study attempted to explore the utility and perceived effectiveness of curfew ordinances. It responded to specific policy inquiries made by police agencies to community policing centers regarding curfew ordinances. Initial data was reported from a national survey of police agencies to determine the extent of curfew use and its perceived effects. Study findings revealed that most jurisdictions with curfews had them in place for several years. In the majority of cases, curfew was seen as an effective tool to control vandalism, graffiti, nighttime burglary, and auto theft. Jurisdictions that did not have curfews reported its non-existence as a result of political reasons, regardless of police support. The effects of curfews on crime rates and other measures still remains unclear.