NCJ Number
103817
Date Published
1987
Length
177 pages
Annotation
This book reviews the history of policy on the use of cameras to photograph or televise trials, examines constitutional issues and popular arguments on the matter, discusses relevant research, and presents an assessment of the debate based on the potential impact of courtroom cameras on viewers.
Abstract
The historical review traces negative reaction to the use of camera coverage of courtroom activities to the 1935 trial of Bruno Hauptmann (Lindbergh baby kidnapping and murder). This was followed by the American Bar Association's passage of Canon 35 in 1937, which banned courtroom photography and live courtroom radio broadcasts. Courts have generally followed this policy until the latter 1970's and the 1980's, when court decisions permitted camera coverage of trials under judicial discretion. The review of constitutional issues and popular arguments focuses on the balancing of the constitutional guarantees of press freedom and the defendant's right to a fair trial. The summary and assessment of courtroom camera-related research addresses the use of video for court administration; camera impact on the dignity, decorum, disruption, and fairness of proceedings; and impacts on various trial participants. Research limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed. The book's concluding section considers the benefits and disadvantages of televised trials from the perspective of impact on the audience. Some variables that may determine beneficial and adverse impacts are identified. Tables, author and subject indexes, and 400-item bibliography.