U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Oblique Chest Views as a Routine Part of Skeletal Surveys Performed for Possible Physical Abuse--Is This Practice Worthwhile?

NCJ Number
222039
Journal
Child Abuse & Neglect Volume: 32 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2008 Pages: 155-159
Author(s)
Karen Kirhofer Hansen; Jeffrey S. Prince; G. William Nixon
Date Published
January 2008
Length
5 pages
Annotation
This study evaluated the utility of oblique chest views in the diagnosis of rib fractures when used as a routine part of the skeletal survey performed for possible physical abuse.
Abstract
Results of this study indicate that the addition of oblique chest views to the standard skeletal survey should be performed to rule out the possibility of physical abuse and that it added information to what was obtained from the two-view chest series, and increased the accuracy with which rib fractures were diagnosed. The study found that use of the four-view chest series changed the number of rib fractures diagnosed using the two-view chest series in 12 of the 22 study cases (54 percent). Overall, the four-view chest series differed significantly in the number of rib fractures diagnosed compared with the two-view chest series (p=.02, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test) adding 19 rib fractures and excluding 6 rib fractures. Twenty-two cases with rib fractures were identified; of the 22 cases, 21 were diagnosed as “abuse” and 1 “not abuse” with metabolic bone disease. Of the 21 abuse cases, 62 percent were male with the mean of 4 months, with a range of 1-17 months; 74 percent were less than 4 months old and 91 percent were less than 1 year old; rib fractures represented the only evidence of injury in one case. The metabolic bone disease case was a 10-month-old female. The study is from the University of Utah Health Sciences Center Institutional Review Board. The study period was from October 2002 through October 2005. References

Downloads

No download available

Availability