NCJ Number
211493
Journal
Forensic Nursing Volume: 1 Issue: 3 Dated: Summer 2005 Pages: 118-123,132
Date Published
2005
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This paper compares and contrasts indicators of quality care for female victims of sexual assault.
Abstract
In many States, "sexual assault" has replaced "rape" as the preferred term for sexual victimization, because it is more gender neutral and covers more types of sexual offenses. The sexual victimization of women has particularly devastating psychological impacts, which may be compounded by insensitive criminal investigations and stressful trials. A coordinated response to caring for and treating victims of sexual assault has become the most accepted approach. In assessing the quality of sexual assault victim services, the current survey evaluated the effectiveness of a community sexual assault response team (SART), which involves partnerships among multiple agencies and a multidisciplinary team devoted to the welfare of the sexual assault victim. The process survey, which measured the structure and content of services implemented, was completed by the president of the SART; and the outcome survey, which measured the impact of the SART on victims, was completed by seven sexual assault victims who received SART services. The SART structure, process, and outcome indicators showed positive collaborative relationships with the multidisciplinary team, a sound organization structure, and excellent communication. Areas of concern were a lack of regular case review and case tracking. Outcome indicators showed that few victims opted for follow-up counseling. Five out of the seven victims expressed regret about reporting the assault to police. Through greater understanding of victims' reactions and gaps in services, SARTs can design more victim-friendly systems that address victim needs throughout the aftermath of the crime and the criminal justice system's response to it. 3 tables and 3 references