NCJ Number
81830
Date Published
1980
Length
250 pages
Annotation
Findings and implications are presented from a study that examined the effects of parole supervision on the rate and character of recidivism.
Abstract
The study analyzed the effects of random discharge from regular parole supervision as practiced in the California Youth Authority (CYA). The CYA randomly assigns a pool of youthful offenders to either complete discharge from jurisdiction or retention on parole supervision. The design resolves problems of selection found in many previous studies and allows a direct test of the effects of no parole supervision and differential criminal justice system reactions based on parole status. The two groups are compared on various outcome measures after 26 months in the community. The findings show no significant difference in outcome between the two groups as measured by arrest and conviction record, number of arrests and convictions, overall time in custody, percentage arrested while correcting for number at risk in the community, and time to arrests and convictions. The parolees, however, were convicted of significantly more severe charges, notably violent crimes such as rape and homicide, while the discharges were more likely to be charged with drug and alcohol offenses. Sentences were more severe for the parolees than the discharges, even taking into account the more severe crimes. In addition to indicating that parole supervision does not reduce recidivism, it indicates that the supervisory structure and threats of parole may induce stress that precipitates aggressive behavior. Details of the study methodology are appended. Tabular data and 100 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)