NCJ Number
114137
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 52 Issue: 3 Dated: (September 1988) Pages: 15-20
Date Published
1988
Length
6 pages
Annotation
As a result of parole placement and mandatory release legislation and the release of several notorious, determinately sentenced offenders, there has been a crystallization of antiparole attitudes in California.
Abstract
Community groups have developed a new awareness of their power to influence the political process as a means of limiting the State's ability to locate release facilities, parole offices, and even individual offenders in particular communities. Community action and education has also resulted in court decisions establishing new rights for both parole authorities and the public, as well as legislation that imposes severe limitations and elaborate notification procedures on parole operations. Parole authorities must recongize the important role played by public opinion and act to shape it. Operational fairness provides a strong base for public acceptance of parole. Operational firmness requires that there be an equitable distribution of parolees on a rational basis. It means not overloading seemingly tolerant communities with high visibility cases. It means that parole facilities be located with great regard for the location of schools, churches, residences for the mentally disabled, and other criminal justice agencies. It also requires that local law enforcement agencies and public officials be kept informed about parole plans and activities. In addition strategies must be developed for ensuring sound and appropriate placements and supervision. Finally, efforts are needed to educate the various publics of the benefits of parole supervision. 30 footnotes.