NCJ Number
217435
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 70 Issue: 3 Dated: December 2006 Pages: 32-36
Date Published
December 2006
Length
5 pages
Annotation
After a retrospective analysis of the traditional philosophies of parole agencies in the United States, this paper provides a prospective analysis of how the parole system can correct its currently unstable and confusing system.
Abstract
The prospective analysis of an appropriate model for parole in the 21st century proposes the principle of community reintegration. This involves the provision of resources and targeted supervision that addresses the needs and risks of offenders as they seek to find a satisfying and constructive life in the community. The original intention of parole supervision was not to find reasons to revoke parole, but rather to assess the parolee's progress continually and make necessary changes. Significant changes in the criminal justice system over the last three decades have modified much of the preparations for release. Parole board administrators have emphasized the management of risk and the intensive supervision of inmates upon release. Rehabilitation and the medical model of corrections and parole are no longer appropriate guidelines for meeting current demands on parole authorities and parole officers. Incompatible supervision styles of casework and surveillance combined with the public's concern for safety have created confusion and an absence of broad acceptance of norms for the design and implementation of parole. 35 references