U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Philadelphia Career Criminal Program - Report and Evaluation, December 1980

NCJ Number
76809
Date Published
1980
Length
17 pages
Annotation
Findings and conclusions are reported from an evaluation of the first 15 months of operation of Philadelphia's Career Criminal Program, intended to prosecute accused offenders with long records of prior serious crimes.
Abstract
The program started in July 1979 using LEAA funding plus local matching funds. A career criminal unit was established in the Philadelphia district attorney's office to identify repeat offenders among persons arrested, provide intensive prosecution efforts and reduce plea bargaining for these offenders, and to increase convictions and remove recidivists from the streets. The unit initially contained six experienced assistant district attorneys, two secretaries, one paralegal, one analyst, and one court administrative officer. The program accepted 230 cases during its first 15 months, which was somewhat lower than the number expected. Over half the cases involved robbery; the remainder involved burglary, aggravated assault, homicide, and rape. The defendants had adult records which included 1,820 arrests and 898 prior convictions. Of the 167 cases which were disposed, 27 defendants were discharged and 22 were dismissed due to withdrawal of prosecution. Of the 117 defendants brought to trial, 105 were convicted. Despite efforts to reduce continuances, delays were granted 266 times at preliminary hearings during the first year. The time from arrest to verdict averaged 118.6 days during the first year. Among benefits noted by the unit's staff were improved victim/witness cooperation, more complete case preparation and investigation, minimization of continuances, increased conviction rates, and stiffer sentences. Reported crime in Philadelphia has not decreased since the program's inception; reduction of overall crime rates may be an unrealistic goal for such programs. The program's cost is high, but as time goes on the average cost per conviction should decrease. The program has succeeded in concentrating the best prosecutors on the most serious cases. Tables and footnotes are provided.