U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Police Use of Discretion in Encounters with People with Opioid Use Disorder: a Study of Illinois Police Officers

NCJ Number
309686
Journal
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Volume: 39 Issue: 1 Dated: March 2024 Pages: 141-156
Author(s)
Brandon del Pozo; Jessica Reichert; Kaitlin Martins; Bruce Taylor
Date Published
March 2024
Length
16 pages
Annotation

This document describes the research methodology and findings from a study of officer decision-making in their responses to encounters with individuals with opioid use disorder; the article describes the analysis of survey data from the project; and suggests ways that police officers can make discretionary decisions that improve their encounters with and health outcomes of people with OUD.

Abstract

Police frequently encounter people with opioid use disorder (OUD), having a profound effect on their risk environment and health outcomes. Officers retain significant discretionary authority in their response to these encounters. To explore the factors that underlie these decisions, the authors surveyed a sample of Illinois police officers. They administered an online survey to Illinois police departments using a random sampling strategy, stratified by agency size and the rurality of their service areas. Their final sample was 248 police officers from 27 departments. The authors surveyed officers’ beliefs about (1) influences and control over their decision making; (2) the approval of other actors in making referrals to treatment for addiction, and (3) the potential impacts of medication-assisted treatment (MAT). They analyzed the survey data using descriptive statistics and regression analyses. Most officers were highly influenced by the expectations of their supervisors when responding to subjects who appeared to have an OUD, and about half would take direction from addiction treatment providers. Police in urban departments perceived greater support for MAT and were more likely to believe MAT could reduce the need for future arrests. The authors’ findings suggest ways police officers can be influenced to make discretionary decisions that improve the health outcomes of their encounters with people with OUD: (1) Supervisors should serve as champions to promote referrals to treatment for substance use disorders; (2) collaboration between law enforcement and community addiction treatment providers should be strengthened, and (3) MAT should be supported and expanded in rural areas. (Published Abstract Provided)