U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Pre-Offer Police Integrity Testing: Scientific Foundation and Professional Issues (From Personality Assessment in Police Psychology: A 21st Century Perspective, P 159-187, 2010, Peter A. Weiss, Ph.D., ed. - see NCJ-231933)

NCJ Number
231940
Author(s)
John W. Jones; Michael R. Cunningham; Kelly D. Dages
Date Published
2010
Length
29 pages
Annotation
This chapter discusses the scientific foundation and professional issues regarding pre-offer police integrity testing.
Abstract
This chapter examines pre-employment assessments for police applicants and how these assessments answer three main questions: which individual qualities are most important to be an effective police officer; which individual qualities should the applicant posses prior to pre-employment selection; and of the qualities a police officer should possess, which can be assessed prior to a conditional offer of employment. In this chapter, pre-employment integrity tests were compared to Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality assessments as potential tools for use in police officer applicant screening. The analysis indicates that pre-employment integrity tests are more successful than FFM measures of conscientiousness in five areas: 1) job relevancy - while FFM assessments would document the importance of integrity and police officer honesty, few police departments use targeted pre-employment integrity tests; 2) validity - FFM measures do not predict employee theft to the degree and magnitude of integrity tests; 3) risk exposure - integrity tests reduce the misconception that police officer candidates do not need to be screened for integrity attitudes; 4) Americans with Disabilities Act compliance - there is greater risk that inappropriate and medically-oriented test items will be included in FFM assessments than in integrity tests; and 5) non-invasiveness - integrity tests are less invasive in terms of measuring clinical/medical issues and general personality traits. Tables, figure, and references