NCJ Number
115659
Journal
Research in Corrections Volume: 1 Issue: 3 Dated: (October 1988) Pages: 52-57
Date Published
1988
Length
6 pages
Annotation
This article critiques Steven H. Clarke's (1988) examination of pretrial release (PTR) concepts, research, and reform strategies.
Abstract
It is suggested that Clarke tried to cover too broad a spectrum of issues and research, and that his assessment, therefore, lacks focus. In addition, his assessment contains several built-in assumptions and biases. These are that (1) PTR needs improvement and expansion, (2) PTR decisions are too conservative and biased, and (3) most arrestees could be released without bail and would still appear in court as directed. Much of the research cited is contradictory and is difficult to use in justifying policy decisions about releases. For example, Clarke discusses the predictability of a defendant's release and the failure of researchers to find characteristics that distinguish defendants who will or will not appear in court or who will or will not be rearrested during PTR. While Clark presents some good advice for assessing the PTR agency's effectiveness and determining local failure rates, his recommendations for reform have not been empirically demonstrated to increase the opportunities for PTR while decreasing its risks.