NCJ Number
229109
Journal
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Volume: 48 Issue: 8 Dated: November-December 2009 Pages: 654-668
Date Published
November 2009
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This comparative analysis of the impact of the differing drug policies of the United States (criminalization) and Canada (harm reduction) focuses on substance abuse prevalence, the significance of gender and substance abuse, drug costs, and the prevalence of drug-related crime.
Abstract
Under the United States' drug control strategy, specific drugs are made illegal under law, and using and being addicted to them is a crime. In Canada, on the other hand, drug policy is based mainly on the harm-reduction model, which focuses on decreasing the adverse health, social, and economic consequences of drug abuse without requiring abstinence from such use. Boyum and Reuter (2005) claim that the number of incarcerated drug offenders in the United States has grown tenfold since 1980, but there is strikingly little evidence that increased punishment has significantly reduced drug use. The U.S. war on drugs is expensive (over $12 billion in 2004 alone). As a response to drug abuse, U.S. national drug policies have emphasized punishment over treatment, which has had a disproportionate impact on low-income communities and minorities. In the United States, there are now more than eight times as many women incarcerated in State and Federal prisons and local jails as there were in 1980. Between 1986 and 1999, the number of women incarcerated in State facilities for drug-related offenses increased 888 percent, surpassing the rate of growth in the number of men imprisoned for similar crimes. In Canada, the cost of substance abuse among both women and men is high in both personal and social terms. Critics from both nations have argued that changes should be made in each country's drug policies. There may be no ideal drug policies overall, just more humane and less harmful ones. 43 references