NCJ Number
115093
Date Published
1987
Length
135 pages
Annotation
After considerating numerous constitutional and policy questions relating to statehood for the District of Columbia, this report concludes that statehood for the nation's capital is unsound as a matter of policy and would require amendment of the Constitution.
Abstract
Reasons which prompted framers of the Constitution to establish the Federal Capitol in a district outside the borders of any State and under Congress's jurisdiction are reviewed. The report describes schemes proposed over the last 200 years to give District residents voting representation in Congress. Arguments favoring and against statehood are summarized. The discussion contends that the sound historical reasons for a Federal District still operate today, particularly the need for the Federal government to remain independent of the any State's influence. Another key argument against statehood is the District's dependence on the Federal Government which is directly or indirectly the largest employer. Moreover, the District lacks the resources both to support a State government and provide its fair share of the cost of the Federal government. Relevant Congressional hearings and proposed legislation are appended.