NCJ Number
109195
Date Published
1984
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This paper examines the concept of restitution and its viability as a program alternative for serious juvenile offenders in Ohio.
Abstract
It is suggested that restitution be considered as a natural alternative for dealing with juvenile delinquency. Its low cost and potential for victim satisfaction and youth offender rehabilitation are seen as favorable arguments for the closer examination of restitution. Current restitution programs in Ohio for juvenile offenders include monetary restitution, community service, and direct service to the victim. Based on findings of the National Juvenile Restitution Initiative, which revealed that serious juvenile offenders can complete their restitution orders, it is recommended that Ohio's juvenile justice system give careful consideration to restitution as a viable program alternative for serious offenders for several reasons. Restitution (1) can provide a meaningful sanction that will hold serious juvenile offenders accountable for what they have done; (2) can be used to identify skill deficits and provide resources to enhance social and work skills, and (3) may be an alternative to the high costs of institutionalization or to longer lengths of institutional stay.