U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

REVENUE AGENT ROLE OF STATE COURTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ADJUDICATION

NCJ Number
141565
Journal
Judicature Volume: 76 Issue: 4 Dated: (December-January 1993) Pages: 195-200
Author(s)
J P Nase
Date Published
1993
Length
6 pages
Annotation
One function for State courts is that of revenue agent as they collect money for State and local government in connection with their adjudication activities.
Abstract
Court collections are rising rapidly; it was estimated in 1988 that the annual amount of fines and other monetary penalties collected by local, State, and Federal courts exceeded $2 billion. The revenue agent role includes bill collecting as well as accounting, auditing, and reporting. Collection activities impact on the courts' staffing decisions; some courts have increased their staff to perform collection activities, thereby adding to their bureaucratization. Ineffective collection practices can have negative consequences for local revenues as well as for the courts themselves in terms of legislative reaction. Courts need to perform administrative tasks involved in recording the amounts collected and distributed, auditing records, and reporting financial data, activities which all require substantial staff time. The revenue agent role has an impact on proposals for State funding of court systems as well as the courts' adjudicatory role. The author also discusses the impact of the courts' revenue agent role on State legislatures and on judicial neutrality. 52 notes

Downloads

No download available

Availability