U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Right of Silence: The Impact of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

NCJ Number
183620
Author(s)
Tom Bucke; Robert Street; David Brown
Date Published
2000
Length
110 pages
Annotation

England's Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994 made important changes to the right of silence; failure by an accused to mention facts during police questioning, that are later relied on at trial, or failure to testify at trial may now by the subject of prosecution comment at trial.

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of the law, relevant Court of Appeal decisions were examined, observations were made at 13 police stations, and investigating police officers who had carried out interviews with suspects were surveyed. The court held that failure by the police to disclose details of the prosecution case prior to interview did not make evidence of the accused's silence inadmissible. Legal advice to remain silent did not necessarily mean that the accused's failure to mention facts later relied on in court was reasonable and that no inferences could be drawn. Provisions of the law did not lead to an increase in the demand for legal advice by suspects held in police custody. Legal advisors increasingly asked for and were generally given more information about the case against their clients prior to police interviews. Despite decreased reliance on silence, there was no change in the proportion of suspects providing admissions. Some interviewees felt that silence would generally play only a marginal role in the decision to prosecute, although it could provide an additional item of evidence on which to base the decision to prosecute and could tip the balance in favor of prosecution in some borderline cases. Most attorneys agreed that fewer defendants were declining to testify. The report concludes that provisions of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act have had a marked impact on suspect use of silence at police stations, police practices in relation to interviewing and disclosure, the advice given at police stations by legal advisors, the proportion of defendants testifying at trial, the way in which cases are prosecuted and defended at trial, and judge directions to the jury. An appendix contains Sections 34-38 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act. References, footnotes, and tables

Downloads

No download available