U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Risky Facilities: Crime Radiators or Crime Absorbers? A Comparison of Internal and External Levels of Theft

NCJ Number
248234
Journal
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Volume: 30 Issue: 3 Dated: September 2014 Pages: 389-414
Author(s)
Kate Bowers
Date Published
September 2014
Length
26 pages
Annotation
To undertake the first exploration of the nature of the relationship between internal crime (those that happen within facilities) and external crime (those occurring outside but in the nearby locale of facilities).
Abstract
To undertake the first exploration of the nature of the relationship between internal crime (those that happen within facilities) and external crime (those occurring outside but in the nearby locale of facilities). The following questions are addressed. Do those localities that suffer high volumes of crime internally within their facilities also suffer high levels of crime in their immediate external environment? How is this influenced by the distribution of internal theft across facilities? What are the likely mechanisms for any relationship found? Spatial regression is used to explore these relationships using data for 30,144 incidents of theft from a Metropolitan area of the UK arranged into small 50 50 m grid squares. Variables used in the analysis include counts of external and internal theft, counts of victimized and 'risky' facilities, indicators of land-use and a proxy for the on-street population. There is found to be a strong positive relationship between internal and external theft that appears to be strengthened by the existence of facilities suffering particularly high crime volumes. Results suggest that internal theft problems precede external ones and that the physical concentration of chronically risky facilities is a particularly strong predictor of external theft problems. An argument is made that risky facilities act as crime 'radiators', causing crime in the immediate environment as well as internally. This has implications for crime prevention policy in terms of facility placement and management. Abstract published by arrangement with Springer.