U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Screening for "Substance Abuse" Among School-based Youth in Mexico Using the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument (POSIT) for Teenagers

NCJ Number
205008
Journal
Substance Use & Misuse Volume: 39 Issue: 2 Dated: January 2004 Pages: 307-329
Author(s)
William W. Latimer Ph.D.; Megan S. O'Brien Ph.D.; Olga Toussova M.Sc.; Leah J. Floyd Ph.D.; Marco Vazquez B.S.; Jorge McDouall M.D.
Date Published
January 2004
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This study used a sample of school students in Mexico to test indexes of classification accuracy of the Spanish-language version of the Substance Use/Abuse scale of the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers (POSIT).
Abstract
The sample consisted of 1,203 youth who were attending 1 middle school (n=619) and 1 high school (n=584) in the third largest city of Coahuila, a northern Mexican border State. The study was conducted in May 1998. Indexes of classification accuracy of the POSIT Substance Use/Abuse scale were evaluated against a "drug abuse" problem severity criterion that combined youth who met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse/dependence disorders with youth who had used other illicit drugs five or more times in their lifetime. The study found that using a cut score of one or two on the POSIT Substance Use/Abuse scale generally yielded optimal classification accuracy indexes that varied somewhat by gender and school subgroups. The classification accuracy of the POSIT Substance Use/Abuse scale was slightly better when used with high school males. This was due, in part, to the higher base rate of serious involvement in substance use among this group compared to other study participants. As with any screening tool, these study findings suggest that users of the POSIT in Mexican schools must weigh the relative importance of identifying a maximum number of at-risk cases (sensitivity) at the expense of specificity and overall classification compared with maximizing classification accuracy at the expense of sensitivity. Although the current study findings support those of Marino et al. (1998), they should be interpreted with caution while awaiting additional research with urban and rural youth across multiple school systems and States within northern Mexico that use multiple assessment strategies. 2 tables and 32 references