U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Six T's: Barriers to Screening Teens for Substance Abuse in Primary Care

NCJ Number
218629
Journal
Journal of Adolescent Health Volume: 40 Issue: 5 Dated: May 2007 Pages: 456-461
Author(s)
Shari Van Hook MPH; Sion Kim Harris Ph.D.; Traci Brooks M.D.; Peggy Carey M.D.; Robert Kossack M.D.; John Kulig M.D.; John R. Knight M.D.
Date Published
May 2007
Length
6 pages
Annotation
This study investigated barriers to adolescent substance abuse screenings in primary care settings.
Abstract
Study results indicated that primary care providers most commonly reported lack of time as the main barrier to adolescent substance abuse screening, followed by lack of training on how to manage a positive screen. While providers reported they had sufficient time to administer a short substance abuse screen, they did not have sufficient time to manage a positive result during a well care visit. Other barriers reported by primary care providers included the need to triage competing problems, lack of treatment resources, difficult parents, and unfamiliarity with screening tools. The findings suggest that a lack of time combined with poor training on how to handle positive screenings is keeping many primary care providers from screening those adolescents most in need of help. Providers clearly need training, education, and support for substance abuse screening in order to provide appropriate care for their adolescent patients. Future research should focus on developing effective methods for handling positive substance abuse screens during primary care visits. Participants were 38 primary care providers at 6 sites who completed focus group interviews about barriers to adolescent substance abuse screenings. The resulting data was transcribed and analyzed by ranking barriers across all sites by the number of groups identifying the barrier. Then the mean ranking was calculated for each barrier. Table, references

Downloads

No download available

Availability