NCJ Number
242717
Journal
Journal of Forensic Identification Volume: 63 Issue: 2 Dated: March/April 2013 Pages: 205-218
Date Published
April 2013
Length
14 pages
Annotation
This study explored the variability that exists in footwear impression comparison conclusions.
Abstract
The 2009 National Academy of Science report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, cited a 1996 European study of footwear examiner conclusions and used it to illustrate that there were "considerable differences" between conclusions of footwear examiners. The basic methodology of that study was repeated in 2009 in North America. Six footwear case studies were created and sent to participating certified footwear examiners. The examiners were asked to independently assess each case based on features that were clearly marked on each impression, and they were directed to use a specific scale of conclusions to report their findings. The results of this study, in contrast to the 1996 study, were that when experienced examiners used the same conclusion scale and compared the same features, there was little variability within their stated findings. (Published Abstract)