U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

SUBTRACTING INSULT FROM INJURY - AUSTRALIA

NCJ Number
63334
Author(s)
C R FOLEY-JONES; A B SMITH
Date Published
1977
Length
16 pages
Annotation
OPPOSITION TO IMPROVING PRISON CONDITIONS IN AUSTRALIA IS EXAMINED AND ATTRIBUTED TO THE FAILURE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE COMPENSATION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMES.
Abstract
THE TYPICAL AUSTRALIAN FEELS THAT CRIMINALS SHOULD BE EXILED TO A HARSH ENVIRONMENT IN ORDER TO BE PUNISHED, NOT REHABILITATED. ATTITUDES TOWARD PRISONERS IN SWEDEN, CANADA, AND THE UNITED STATES ARE DESCRIBED. BOTH AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES DENY PRISONERS MANY RIGHTS OF CITIZENSHIP AND CONTINUE THIS DISCRIMINATION BY REFUSING EMPLOYMENT TO PERSONS WITH CRIMINAL RECORDS. MODERN CRIMINAL LAW PROVIDES NO COMPENSATION FOR VICTIMS, AND LEGAL PROCESSES ARE OFTEN EMBARRASSING FOR THEM AND CAUSE FINANCIAL PROBLEMS. IN CONTRAST, VICTIMS OF AUTOMOBILE AND WORK-RELATED ACCIDENTS ARE AWARDED CASH SETTLEMENTS. IF VICTIM COMPENSATION BECOMES INTEGRATED INTO CRIMINAL LAW, THE PRISON SYSTEM WILL HAVE TO CONSIDER RESTITUTION PROGRAMS, IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF PRISON INDUSTRIES, REDEFINING PRISONERS' RIGHTS IN AREAS SUCH AS MINIMUM WAGE, AND ESTABLISHING A SYSTEM OF COMPENSATION BASED ON EARNINGS FROM PRISON INDUSTRIES. UNTIL THE PUBLIC FEELS THAT CRIMINAL LAW EFFECTIVELY REDRESSES WRONGS, STRONG OPPOSITION TO IMPROVING PRISON CONDITIONS IS LIKELY TO CONTINUE. REFERENCES AND NOTES ON RESTITUTION PROGRAMS ARE APPENDED. (MJM)

Downloads

No download available

Availability