NCJ Number
94924
Journal
Law and Policy Volume: 6 Issue: 2 Dated: (April 1984) Pages: 231-251
Date Published
1984
Length
21 pages
Annotation
This article examines the merits of two alternative briefs in Equal Protection litigation of police misconduct.
Abstract
The several suits brought against the Philadelphia Police Department illustrate the shortcomings of the judicially preferred intentionality brief and indicate the need for a more completely specified institutional brief. The background of the two briefs is traced to a dialectical conflict between discretion and control in the idea of law enforcement. The use of force is not a philosophical issue for a policeman. It is not a question of should or whether, but when and how much (Rubinstein 1973:323). Fifteen notes and 35 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)