Testing Probation Outcomes in an Evidence-Based Practice Setting: Reduced Caseload Size and Intensive Supervision Effectiveness

• NCJ Number: 230847
• Journal: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Volume: 49 Issue: 4 Dated: May-June 2010 Pages: 233-253
• Author(s): Sarah Kuck Jalbert; William Rhodes; Christopher Flygare; Michael Kane
• Date Published: May 2010
• Length: 21 pages
• Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
• Publication Format: Article
• Publication Type: Report (Study/Research)
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

This study examined whether criminal recidivism decreases with reduced caseloads in an agency that uses evidence based practices.

Abstract

Probation and parole professionals argue that supervision outcomes would improve if caseloads were reduced below commonly achieved standards. Criminal justice researchers are skeptical because random assignment and strong observation studies have failed to show that criminal recidivism decreases with reductions in caseload sizes. One explanation is that caseload reduction by itself is insufficient; supervision must also be allotted and distributed to make the best use of supervision resources, a cornerstone of evidence-based practice (EBP). This study uses a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to test the null hypothesis that reduced caseload in an agency using EBP has no effect on criminal recidivism. The conclusions are that reduced caseloads in this context probably reduce criminal recidivism and probably do not increase revocations for technical violations. Tables, figures, notes, and references (Published Abstract)