NCJ Number
243100
Date Published
2011
Length
12 pages
Annotation
This chapter examines the differences between guilt and shame as well as the degree to which each contributes to sexual assault, followed by a discussion of treatment implications for each of these concepts.
Abstract
The relapse prevention model proposed for comparing these concepts focuses on the role of shame and guilt in relation to the abstinence violation effect (AVE), i.e., feelings and their impact following reoffending. A "theoretical conceptualization of negative affect" involves a discussion of similarities between shame and guilt, shame as a reflection of a negative self-appraisal, how shame fuels anger, and guilt's focus on specific transgressions. Theories of shame and guilt applied to sexual offenders are then discussed. Consideration of the treatment implications of the theoretical model of shame and guilt addresses the manner in which treatment is delivered. The treatment delivery must be such that shame and its accompanying negative responses can be overcome and guilt can be used in the treatment process. The focus in treatment should be on guilt as a response to sexual offending. In achieving this, it is necessary to distinguish the offender as a person from his offending behavior. This distinction is important for enhancing sexual offenders' self-esteem, a primary component of behavioral change. Making behaviors the focus in treatment, rather than the person, should promote a reduction in feelings of shame and an emphasis on feelings of guilt. Once offenders recognize that it is their behavior, not themselves that is the problem their optimism over the possibility of change should increase. A discussion of research implications notes that it is important to conduct systematic evaluations of the relationship between the mode/style of treatment delivery, the treatment process, subsequent experience of shame or guilt in the treatment process, and client progress toward treatment goals. 29 references