NCJ Number
10214
Date Published
1962
Length
8 pages
Annotation
A COMPARISON OF OCCUPATIONAL HARM AS RESULT OF A CRIMINAL COURT RECORD ON UNSKILLED WORKERS AND OF A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE SUIT ON DOCTORS.
Abstract
WHILE THE EXISTENCE OF A CRIMINAL RECORD CAUSED SUBSTANTIAL OCCUPATIONAL HARM TO UNSKILLED WORKERS, THE MALPRACTICE SUITS DID NOT DO WIDESPREAD OCCUPATIONAL DAMAGE TO THE DOCTORS INVOLVED. SEVERAL EXPLANATIONS ARE OFFERED TO CLARIFY THIS DISPARITY. ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION IS THAT DIVERSE MOTIVES OPERATED TO DISTORT THE REPORTS OF DOCTORS, WHILE THE INTERVIEW METHOD DID NOT ALLOW DISTORTION ON THE PART OF THE UNSKILLED WORKERS. ANOTHER FACTOR MAY BE THE FACT THAT ALL POTENTIAL EMPLOYERS KNEW OF THE WORKERS CRIMINAL RECORD WHEREAS FEW PATIENTS KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THE MALPRACTICE SUITS IN WHICH THE DOCTORS WERE INVOLVED.