U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

VICTIM PARTICIPATION IN PLEA-BARGAINING - A FIELD EXPERIMENT (FROM PLEA-BARGAINING, 1980, BY WILLIAM F MCDONALD AND JAMES A CRAMER - SEE NCJ-66765)

NCJ Number
66772
Author(s)
A M HEINZ; W A KERSETTER
Date Published
1980
Length
11 pages
Annotation
THE CONSEQUENCES OF VICTIM PRESENCE AT PLEA NEGOTIATIONS WERE EXAMINED THROUGH OBSERVATION OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES THAT TOOK PLACE DURING 1977 IN DADE COUNTY, FLA.
Abstract
THE DADE COUNTY PROCEDURE SPECIFIED THAT VICTIMS' VIEWS WERE TO HAVE THE MOST WEIGHT ON THE ISSUE OF THE APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION OR RESTITUTION FOR LOSSES OR INJURIES SUSTAINED AS A RESULT OF A DEFENDANT'S ACTION. THEY WERE TO HAVE ONLY LIMITED IMPORTANCE IN THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATION OF THE LARGER SOCIAL ENDS TO BE SERVED BY SENTENCE. THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL FOR SYSTEMATIC INVOLVEMENT OF VICTIMS IN THE PROCESS WAS MET BY PREDICTIONS THAT VICTIMS WOULD DISRUPT THE PROCESS, WOULD MISUNDERSTAND THE DISCUSSIONS AND ACCUSE THE JUDGE AND ATTORNEYS OF AN UNSAVORY DEAL, AND WOULD BE VENGEFUL AND MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO REACH A JUST SETTLEMENT. BECAUSE OF THE RELATIVELY LOW ATTENDANCE BY VICTIMS, THE SESSIONS' IMPACT IS DIFFICULT TO ASSESS. HOWEVER, NONE OF THE PREDICTIONS WERE BORNE OUT BY THE DADE COUNTY EXPERIMENT; SETTLEMENT RATE REMAINED THE SAME, AND THE EFFECT ON SENTENCING, IF ANY, WAS TOWARD A REDUCTION IN SENTENCE SEVERITY AND USE OF INCARCERATION. THE REDUCTION OF TIME FROM ARRAIGNMENT TO DISPOSITION SUGGESTED THAT THE PRETRIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MAY REPRESENT A SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT IN TERMS OF COST. NEVERTHELESS PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDES TOWARD THE CONFERENCE WERE MIXED. THE CONFERENCE'S POSITIVE IMPACT ON LAY AND POLICE PARTICIPATION WAS LIMITED. COSTS INVOLVED IN NOTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS WERE ONE IDENTIFIABLE BURDEN. YET, TRADITIONAL PLEABARGAINING HAS BEEN SECRETIVE, EXCLUSIVE AND FORMAL. THE PRETRIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WHILE BEING MORE OPEN, INCLUSIVE, AND FORMAL, HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO IMPEDE CASE SETTLEMENTS. THE CONFERENCE, WITHOUT INCREASED COSTS, PROVIDES VICTIMS, DEFENDANTS, AND POLICE WITH IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE CRIMINAL CASE DISPOSITION PROCESS, AND THEREFORE, IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY. REFERENCES ARE INCLUDED. (MHP)