U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Victimization Surveys and the Accuracy and Reliability of Official Crime Data in Developing Countries

NCJ Number
169947
Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice Volume: 25 Issue: 6 Dated: (November/December 1997) Pages: 463-475
Author(s)
O Marenin
Date Published
1997
Length
13 pages
Annotation
The little research done on victimization and the police in developing countries shows that levels of nonreporting of crime, reasons for nonreporting, and relations between the public and the police are vastly different among developing countries and between developing and developed countries.
Abstract
Researchers agree that official data, especially those from developing countries, must be viewed with caution, because they suffer from the two major defects of all official crime data: their precision and reliability is dependent on the vagaries of citizens reporting their experiences to the police and to the data-collection and processing decisions made by government agents. A major problem for research on crime in developing countries is that the most common resource and method for estimating the degree of unreliability and inaccuracy of official data, i.e., victimization surveys, is not consistently available. One way to address this situation is for researchers to become familiar with data-collection methodologies of specific countries as well as international research and findings. Further, in order to allow for comparisons of nonreporting levels and reasons across countries, researchers must conduct victimization surveys and continue them over some time to develop trend lines. Questions about reasons for not reporting crime to police should be included in such surveys. Specific types of victimizations believed to be underreported should be studied separately as problems in methodology and interpretation. 15 notes and 87 references