NCJ Number
84119
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 46 Issue: 2 Dated: (June 1982) Pages: 25-29
Date Published
1982
Length
5 pages
Annotation
Although evaluations of volunteer programs have generally been methodologically flawed and too narrow in the scope of criteria measured, all have shown positive results from the use of volunteers.
Abstract
The predominant weaknesses of the evaluation designs for volunteer programs are the lack of an effective control group and the choice of variables to be measured. There is a proportionally large reliance on subjective impressionistic data, with little or no evidence of control for bias. One of the methodologically correct evaluations was performed on the California M-2 Sponsors program, which assigns volunteers to work with inmates. Three groups were used in the evaluation: (1) the study group, which consisted of inmates matched with volunteers; (2) a control group composed of inmates who applied for a sponsor but were not matched; and (3) a control group of inmates who did not apply for an M-2 sponsor. Recidivism was measured by favorable parole outcome over 1 year. The study group performed significantly better than the control groups. The strength of the evaluation, in addition to using two control groups, is its measurement of a wide range of variables and the development of a data base over time. The data base will permit continuous monitoring of relative program impact as the environment changes and as various program components are changed. A uniform set of effectiveness criteria should be developed. The criteria should not be limited to recidivism measures but should include changes in attitudes and behavior not directly related to crime rates. Nine bibliographic listings are provided.