NCJ Number
141153
Journal
Federal Probation Volume: 56 Issue: 4 Dated: (December 1992) Pages: 53-57
Date Published
1992
Length
5 pages
Annotation
The effects of the administrative changes in the maximum security prison in New Zealand offers an example of the influence of corrections management on inmate subcultures.
Abstract
The experience of three prisons over a 30-year time period reveals that cohesive opposition is the only inmate response to administrative absolutism. This inmate reaction appeared at the Mt. Eden facility in the late 1950's, when the prison moved from its failed experiment with a form of pluralism, in which selected inmates aided the administration, to one of authoritarian management. Cohesive opposition continued in the subsequent austere regimes. The violent antagonism that accompanied inmate cohesion began to break down only when prison officials adopted a more conciliatory approach. Subsequently, a spirit of mutual cooperation guided staff-inmate relations. The experience of this and other New Zealand facilities has shown that a rise in the level of administrative oppression in secure institutions causes inmate self-commitment to deepen. Conversely, when the external threat is removed, a reduction in tension allows defenses to relax and a mood of tolerance to develop. Therefore, corrections administrators in the United States and New Zealand should not respond to prison overcrowding by abandoning expensive accommodative penology in favor of a cheap authoritarian expedient, because the resulting tension, violence, and equipment destruction may not save money. 30 references