NCJ Number
155010
Journal
Journal of State Government Volume: 63 Issue: 2 Dated: (April-June 1990) Pages: 52-54
Date Published
1990
Length
3 pages
Annotation
This analysis of programs to address drug abuse argues that coordinated and comprehensive efforts are needed and that the State governments have the main responsibility for the development of effective and efficient drug control strategies.
Abstract
A comprehensive drug war requires action in the streets, offices, homes, factories, malls, schools, churches, playgrounds, statehouses, and city halls in the United States. Innovative strategies are needed for demand reduction, community-based prevention, and supply interdiction. Common goals and strategies are needed at the Federal, State, and local levels. Although national initiatives and the allocation of Federal funds bring arguments for local control and bypassing of State government, successful antidrug programs depend on coordinated State strategies that are comprehensive and unimpeded by jurisdictional limitations. Such programs also permit State and Federal funds to be used for effective and accountable programs. Michigan's efforts exemplify the successful coordination of a multifaceted antidrug initiative involving Federal, State, and local programs, personnel, and financial resources. Coordinated strategies are particularly important in law enforcement, because most criminal drug enterprises are not based within jurisdictional boundaries. Coordinated and cooperative drug strategies can be cost-efficient, because few communities have the resources or programs to act totally alone. 6 references